IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF HUMAN ACTIONS IN CASE OF SGTR INITIATING EVENT

Authors

  • K. U. Rahman Centre for Nuclear Safety, Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA), P. O. Box 1912, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • N. Arshad Centre for Nuclear Safety, Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA), P. O. Box 1912, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • H. M. Z. Arif Centre for Nuclear Safety, Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA), P. O. Box 1912, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • U. Habib Centre for Nuclear Safety, Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA), P. O. Box 1912, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • S. Kanwal Centre for Nuclear Safety, Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority (PNRA), P. O. Box 1912, Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract

Identification and modeling of human actions, from safety point of view is an important part of human reliability analysis of Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA). In case of SGTR, human actions have significant effect on the safety and radioactive releases. The human actions, isolation of defective steam generator (IFSG), pressure balance between primary and secondary side (OAPB) and reactor cool down and depressurization (OACD) were modeled and analyzed in this study. Probabilities associated with these human actions were estimated using Standardized Plant Analysis Risk associated with Human (SPAR-H) with generic data. HEPs are 0.0564, 0.0952 and 0.1059 for IFSG, OAPB and OACD respectively. Human error probabilities were the major contributors to core damage frequency of SGTR.

References

C. Acosta and N. Siu, “Event Tree and

Dynamic Event Tree: Application to SGTR

Accident†IAEA-SM-321/9, Proceedings of an

International Symposium Vienna (3-7 June,

.

International Atomic Energy Agency,

“Collection and classification of human

reliability data for use in probabilistic safety

assessmentsâ€, IAEA-TECDOC-1048, Vienna

(1998).

Stefan Hirschberg, “Human Reliability

Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment

for Nuclear Power Plants†Nuclear Safety,

ISBN 92-64-02157-4, NEA No. 5068, NEA

(2004).

United States National Regulatory

Commission, “Steam Generator Tube

Failures†NUREG/CR-6365, USNRC,

Washington (1996).

Pekka Pyy,“Human Reliability Analysis

methods for Probabilistic Safety

Assessment†VTT Publication 420, Technical

Research Centre, Finland (2000).

Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission,“

Steam Generator Tube Rupture Emergency

Operating Procedure†Chashma Nuclear

Power Plant, EOP System, 37 EOP-005,

Rev. 0, CNPP-1, 2005.

US National Regulatory Commission, “The

SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Methodâ€,

NUREG/CR-6883, Idaho National

Laboratory, Washington (2005).

Downloads

Published

29-06-2020

How to Cite

[1]
K. U. Rahman, N. Arshad, H. M. Z. Arif, U. Habib, and S. Kanwal, “IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF HUMAN ACTIONS IN CASE OF SGTR INITIATING EVENT”, The Nucleus, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 331–336, Jun. 2020.

Issue

Section

Articles